🔗 Share this article

Europe felt a moment of respite on Monday, as the tension triggered by the presentation of a new comprehensive peace framework for resolving the conflict appeared – briefly – to have been stabilised. A American diplomat spoke of "significant advancement" after bilateral negotiations in Geneva. On Monday night, the Kremlin made its countermove: a renewed assault of rocket attacks on Kyiv.

The Rhythm of Peace Talks and Military Action

The sequence of opposing developments captured the grim essence of the current period. By day, diplomatic battles are conducted: optimistic declarations are issued from multiple capitals. Considerable effort is allocated on managing certain initiatives. By night, Russian leadership clearly shows the world that, for them, war remains the main instrument for achieving "settlement".

Nighttime Reality

As Russia's attack progressed into the early hours of Tuesday, the present situation of Ukraine's vulnerability was laid bare. Ukraine is able to track rocket firings from across the border, a capacity afforded by up-to-date information. From vantage locations, defense planes that had been dispatched to counter approaching guided weapons roared overhead – sophisticated military planes delivered to Ukraine by Western partners.

Soon thereafter, Kyiv's air-defence systems activated: several firings fired to intercept a Russian ballistic missile. This was a sophisticated defense system at work, probably delivered by partner states. Every deployment jolts you unexpectedly, rattling buildings. The instant of fear quickly becomes grim resignation: perhaps the approaching threat won't cause damage this time, protecting urban areas from devastation and another blackout.

Continuous Dangers

Following this, a automatic firearm engaged a unmanned aircraft somewhere nearby, part of a mobile-fire group – most likely imported technology. Unfortunately, the shots failed to hit the hostile drone – it maintained course toward its target.

Intermittently, this continued until dawn. Kyiv awoke to the daybreak reports: seven people killed, devastation and utility failures in many homes as a result of the evening attack. As customarily, everyone still continued their routines – living the war. But those full day encapsulated Ukraine's vital need on external assistance – a dependence that neighboring countries are evidently unprepared to fill in the short term.

Unsuccessful Negotiations

The comprehensive proposal from US administration sparked intense emotion, discussion and deep concern – and temporarily diverted attention from Ukraine's largest corruption scandal in years. Yet, we have witnessed similar scenarios, after earlier high-level meetings and multilateral gatherings.

Every new proposal from US leadership adheres to the identical sequence: a negotiation push against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with other European capitals, succeeds in resisting. They stabilise the situation but never actually secure success. This pattern will, no doubt, continue.

Tactical Assessments

It is easy to blame certain parties of persistently promoting Kremlin's demands. But that does not seem to be the entire situation. American leadership operates on a assumption well known to seasoned negotiators: you cannot achieve through diplomacy what you have lost on the battlefield. The White House presumes that it is unrealistic to pressure the Kremlin to surrender the land that it presently holds in Ukraine's occupied territories.

The problem is that while recognising this factual reality, Washington does little to discourage Russia, through diplomacy or military means, from assuming that the current condition will not shift further in its benefit in the coming year.

Opposing Positions

Therefore, the Kremlin is certain that the clock favors them – that Ukraine and its supporters are nearing depletion. Their motivation to agree to terms that does not give them the largest achievable advantage is virtually nonexistent. There may be multiple initiatives to achieve ceasefire, but they will continue as long as Russia's leadership remains supremely confident in the conclusion.

On the contrary, Ukrainian leadership believes that Ukraine can still persist, gradually sacrificing people and territory but avoiding a complete military breakdown until conditions improve in its advantage.

Present Conditions

Objectively, there are no genuine requirements for a ceasefire. Now, personal considerations are entering the equation: leadership ambitions to negotiate peace and obtain worldwide acknowledgment, and Ukrainian leadership's twin challenges – on one hand, not to estrange crucial supporters, and on the other, to rally Ukrainians around the national cause against any proposal Kyiv finds unacceptable, so that their priority does not switch to homefront challenges. And although their task will now be considerably more difficult after current events, it remains very improbable that this will change their overall approach.

These conflicting dynamics are guiding negotiations.

Conclusion and Outlook

It took a only one week to terminate the 28 points of the latest plan. Aggressive and erratic handling of the matter by US administration, pushback by Ukraine and the remaining European nations, along with soothing efforts of representatives, and finally, recent disclosures, all achieved their purpose.

While new initiatives based on previous concepts are approaching, Kyiv, London and other allied nations should draw one fundamental conclusion: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to counter negotiation assaults from Washington that are based on Russian demands and reflect specific hesitation to change the course of events, if they maintain solidarity and enhance their military capacity at a significantly accelerated rate. If they do, neither political nor armed coercion will be able to overcome them. In the meantime, Ukraine's capability to counter nocturnal attacks will, for the predictable period, primarily depend on sustained allied backing.